header image header image

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Live-Off-The-Floor Recording by Glen Reely

Sunday, August 18th, 2002

For Smiling Buddha Cabaret, we’d demoed a bunch of songs, then the band went into the studio with Don Smith. After the recording, the consensus with the band and the management was that the demos had…magic, the attitude that wasn’t on the studio stuff. They decided to go with the original recordings, against all odds. Thank God they did!

It was very live-off-the-floor, a lot of first take stuff. Some of the lyrics were just done on the spot! The actual recording’s done through a Mackie 32 8-bus console into three ADATs with a BRC. The real trick is the monitor setup, which is a mirror of the equipment on 54-40’s live stage. All the band’s mics go into a Peavey 16×16 monitor board (model MD Monitor), and from there we take individual feeds into the recording board.

We baffle the drums sometimes, and the guitar amps, but you have to keep eye contact among the band. Basically, it’s all in the same room – no isolation – and the monitor is loud as hell. Still, I can play people the tapes and solo the overhead mics, and they’re amazed at how minimal the leakage is. Neil has a great sound with an Audio Technica AT4031 – a three hundred dollar mic; sounds great! We put that through an Alesis compressor for deessing, with a Boss EQ in the side chain. We put on a regular pop filter, and that setup seems to enhance the intelligibility of the vocals.

You do sacrifice the room sound, obviously, so sometimes I’ll take a track, feed it out through a monitor into a live room., then record the amience and add it in later.

Glen Reely, recording/live engineer for 54-40. Credit include their recent album, Smiling Buddha Cabaret.

The Middle Side Stereo Microphone Technique by George Kourounis

Sunday, August 18th, 2002

Much of modern recorded music that is considered “stereo” is, for the most part, not true stero but rather panned mono (meaning that many of the individual instruments have been recorded on one track of a multitrack tape recorder and then when mixed, the instruments are panned to their appropriate positions in the relation to the left and right of the stereo spectrum). For certain instruments, it is nice to get a wide, true stereo image by setting up multiple microphones and using more than one tape track to record onto. For decades, engineers have been using many different microphone techniques with great success. The idea is anything but new, but I’d like to share one of my favorites with you.

The middle-side coincident stereo miking technique is one of the more complicated ones, but definitely worth the little bit of extra effort required. Take a bi-directional microphone and place it at a 90 degree angle in relation to the sound source (this is our side mic and will be used to pick up reflected ambient sound). Take another microphone and place it as close to the first mic as possible – without letting the two touch – and point it directly towards the sound source. This is our middle mic and can be set to uni-directional (picks up mainly direct sound), bi-directional (direct plus reflected sound from the rear) or omni-directional (a full 360 degrees of pickup range) depending on how much ambient sound you want.

In the control room, you need to use three rails of the console for this technique. Take your middle mic and pan it up the centre, equally to both speakers. Your side mic needs to be split or multied so the same signal comes up on two faders. Pan one of them to the left and one to the right, then invert the phase of either by 180 degrees. Now, you have the flexibility to mix as much of the ambient side signals with the direct middle mic as you wish.

George Kourounis, Instructor of Sound & Recording Techniques, Trebas Institute, Toronto, ON.

Figuring Acoustics Into the Mix by Steve Parton

Sunday, August 18th, 2002

What happens when an acoustic guitar is added to a typical electric rock band’s setup? With drums, bass, vocals and electric guitar, things are pretty much blended together for a sound that everyone is already familiar with. Often, audience members who can see an acoustic guitar onstage can’t hear it, usually because it’s too tinny and the sound tech just turned it down; or it’s feeding back and the player turned it down; or – it’s just a prop.

If an acoustic guitar is next to an electric one, rather than trying to compete for volume (the acoustic will usually lose), I prefer to layer them. Where an electric guitar’s presence is found around 3 to 5 kHz, an acoustic’s clarity and sparkle can be enhanced – or even pushed – to 6 or 7 kHz. The fundamental body of both guitar sounds begins at around 300 Hz, so I usually grant this area to the electric guitar, as too much 300-350 Hz causes feedback in an acoustic guitar anyway. Bob Mould uses this production technique with great success on his Sugar recordings.

Steve Parton, is a Montreal-based sound tech recently returned from a Western Canada tour as live sound engineer with the Mahones.

Calling Spot Cues by Howard Ungerleider

Sunday, August 18th, 2002

Calling spot cues usually involves remembering the names of at least 12 IATSE union workers who change on a nightly basis!

So that you are not calling the name of a prior evening’s spot operator, it’s a good idea to produce a visual spot chart handy at your lighting console. This can sometimes be the most disappointing aspect of the show for a variety of reasons; namely, these individuals do the same job every time for different shows and can be less than enthusiastic about your show or the standards you like to uphold. Novices have trouble with timing and have been known to pick up the guitar tech for a solo rather than the artist. Seasoned veterans, on the other hand, sometimes like to sit in their chairs expecting two or three cues; because I sometimes use spots to create part of a look, I may call 30 or more cues they’re not expecting. I often hear them say I’ve given them a good workout. Some directors use computer-operated spots controlled from the console. I don’t use this method for two reasons: one is that the look becomes very mechanical and does not have the element of subtlety. The other has to do with lack of control when the computer inevitably crashes!

Howard Ungerleider, (Art in Motion, Internal Affairs International) has designed shows for Rod Stewart, Rush, Def Leppard, Queensryche, Tesla, Kim Mitchell and Larry Gowan. He also designs for movies, videos, television, corporate shows and architectural structures.

Making Music With Our Ears by Ron Skinner

Sunday, August 18th, 2002

Over the past decade we have seen the recording industry become more and more dependant on the use of electronics in the creation of our music. The advent of the computer has added a new dimension to the way we record and listen to music. We now have a large selection of inexpensive samplers, keyboards and music sequencing programs at our disposal. For a relatively small investment, a musician can now create high quality recordings in his/her basement. This new technology has spawned a revolution in the music industry and has brought music out of the studio and into the home.

But as we all know, with every positive action there must be an equal and opposite reaction. The development of these new technologies has allowed us greater freedom and creativity; but, at the same time, we may be getting spoiled. When you can hit a key on a keyboard and get a killer kick drum sound, why bother learning how to tune an acoustic drum kit? Or, if you know that you can always rely on your guitar tuner, why bother learning how to tune the guitar? This constant reliance on electronics may actually deter us from making real music.

The use of electronic devices and computer technology now touches every aspect of our industry – studio designers use computers as a ‘quick fix’ in the acoustic design of recording studio control rooms; recording engineers depend on Real Time Spectral Analyzers to ensure that their mix ‘looks’ like everyone else’s; and musicians may have never actually played an acoustic instrument! These are all examples of how technology could be misused. Instead of relying on technology, we should use it to enhance our skills and increase our artistic potential.

Technology is a tool that allows us to be more productive and creative. It allows us greater flexibility and the ability to be precise in our work. However it’s important to remember that it is only a tool. The final determining factor of the quality of our work should always be what we hear with our ears. We should all make an effort to stop looking at our computers and listen. This way, we can once again start making music with our ears and not our eyes.

Ron Skinner, CBC Radio Technician, Toronto Broadcast Centre, Independent Producer and Recording Engineer

Creating Timeless Recordings by Daniel Lanois

Sunday, August 18th, 2002

A timeless recording feels right. And a recording that feels right it usually made up of some kind of truth – for example, a true documentation of how people were playing in the room at that time, uninterrupted by external opinion. If something has a netural feeling, then that’s also a real good ingredient for timelessness.

The irony of timelessness is that sometimes, the most dated things are timeless. You listen to a P-Funk record from the early 70’s – and there’s a crass wah-wah pedal that is dated specific to the day – and everybody thinks it’s wonderful and timeless! I think it’s because there was so much commitment that went into it; it was so much the ‘sound of the moment’ and done with such naivete that it is timeless. Naivete is not something that you can be aware of when you’re trying to work, it’s something that you’re aware of maybe a year down the road; but it’s also a pretty important ingredient to recordings you want to keep listening to.

Daniel Lanois, recording artist, producer (U2, Robbie Robertson, Peter Gabriel)


4056 Dorchester Rd., #202,Niagara Falls, ON
Canada L2E 6M9 Phone: 905-374-8878
FAX: 888-665-1307 mail@nor.com
Web Site Produced by NWC