header image header image

Sound Advice

More Joy of 8-Tracking by Blair Packham

September 18th, 2002

I had been making a record with singer/songwriter Arlene Bishop at Studio 306 in Toronto, when I had the revelation that once we had the drums recorded, we could do all of our overdubs at home on my DA-88.

I had an AKG 414 that sounded good on Arlene’s voice, but we needed a really good compressor — so I got a TL Audio dual valve preamp compressor. That way, we could go direct to tape. We had a DA-88 tape striped with timecode, and we’d do a rough mix onto one or two tracks on the DA-88 in synch. Then at home, listening to that rough mix, Arlene could overdub vocals and I could do guitar overdubs to my heart’s content. We could then go back to the studio and transfer the remote overdubs back onto the two-inch master tape and mix it. We then have the benefit of getting the drums recorded with a better mic selection and a big room, as well as the intimacy of recording at home, all on one recording. I’m now able to work on projects that are meant for release at home. It’s the difference between doing a demo and doing a master. You get the feeling that everything you do now counts. And at a much cheaper price.

Blair Packham — producer/composer; projects include the television score for the series Destiny Ridge and various TSN themes, as well as numerous artists projects.

Live Sound Crutches by Trevor C. Coppen

September 18th, 2002

Many articles have been written on this topic, but it continues to be a popular issue among many touring live sound engineers.

Many live sound technicians travel with items that make their evening run more smoothly. Much like the musicians that hire you, there is an investment being made to the sound that is desired.

A guitar player will buy a special amplifier or guitar which is crucial to their sound. A sound technician should consider the purchase or rental on a per tour basis of microphones and related items such as headphones, mic stands, clamps and patch cables. Model numbers and brands are irrelevant at this point. These are all personal preference.

Using the same headphones and microphones every evening allows you to more quickly distinguish trouble spots in a sound system. In the event that trouble-shooting is necessary, you are able to start further down the chain because you are aware of your own gear, and it is less probable of breaking down.

After completing a tour with an artist, or during those down times, you can always use these “tools” with other artists. These items create a consistency, especially with vocal mics, where hygiene is also a consideration. No matter what the condition of the PA is, or if you are mixing on the fly, you know what your equipment is capable of.

Having your own tools becomes very handy in a support band situation, whether you are supporting or if a support band is in front of you. Your stands and mics are up and there is no question of supply from the club. The support band will get all the house mics and stands. Or, in a supporting situation, the headliner will be pleased to see you with your kit and instruments clamped, miked and ready to go. This will save a lot of worries for yourself, the band, and reduces change-over time, allowing your evening to flow that much smoother.

Trevor C. Coppen is a freelance sound technician based in Toronto, ON. He has worked with such acts as Hayden, Our Lady Peace and The Waltons.

Mastering Tips by Bud Bremner

September 18th, 2002

Food for Thought on A-D/D-A Conversion

When converting audio from analog to digital, we are trying to preserve what we already have, but does it really stay the same? Despite the fact that I’m a huge analog fan, I believe that digital storage and processing are very useful and do have their places, especially in mastering. Even in our studio we have four DAT players including a classic Studer, but some people will question the idea of converting their digital masters back to analog for processing.

We convert to digital, thinking our audio will be as safe as it was before conversion. However, the conversion back to analog brings with it a perceived “analog degradation”. Was the program material perceived to be in a state of degradation before the initial A-D conversion? Probably not. This perceived “analog degradation” is not really an analog problem at all. In almost every case, it can be traced to inadequate conversion to and from digital. Not the state of being in digital, but the conversion process itself.

Consider this:

Contrary to the big-budget marketing hype of various tape and equipment manufacturers, get ready now . . . “There is no such thing as digital sound.” All sound is analog.

Some sounds are generated in a digital environment, but most sounds we hear and record are analog sources (i.e., piano, drums, violins, guitar amps, horns, etc.). Because our ears are not a digital device but an analog transducer, all sound is heard . . . “analog”. So what’s the problem with analog? There really isn’t one. It’s the first and last step in almost every recording session and it’s a great recording medium (how many studios wouldn’t swap their ADATs for a 2″ Studer if they could?), but in all the comparisons I’ve been involved with, the weakest link is still getting in and out of digital with some degree of accuracy.

Most DAT players’ A-D and D-A converters lack the precision of high-end converters such as those available from Apogee, Wadia or Prism. Considering this grade of converter shows up at the 4K-8K price point and higher, and a common DAT player like the Tascam DA-30 costs about 1.5K — only a fraction of this 1.5K goes into the construction of its converters. Imagine a 1/2″ 15 ips Dolby SR master transferred to one of these machines. This would result in a digital recording, but with comparatively low fidelity because of the inaccurate A-D and D-A conversion.

So go ahead and record your tracks to digital, but understand that using a set of high end converters will eliminate the weakest link in the chain, providing you with a precision copy of your work.

Analog ‘0′ vs. Digital ‘0′ – Are They the Same?

In mastering, many digital masters are submitted with different regard to audio levels and their relative reference level tones. While there is no officially recognized standard that bridges the two, many audio engineers (including the author) have found a few simple rules that work well. Most engineers already know these but for those who are just starting out, here are a few points:

Do not put a 1 kHz tone at ‘0′ digital full scale. A tone at this level will be from 12 to 16db higher than it should be, it has virually no relationship to the RMS audio value that it’s supposed to represent and is brutal on your speaker cones and signal path, not to mention your ears. Can you imagine audio levels hovering nicely around 0 VU, preceded by this killer 1 kHz tone ripping your ears off at +15 VU? It happens!

A level reference tone on a DAT, just like on an analog recorder, is supposed to represent RMS audio values, not peak values. On a DAT recorder, a respectable RMS audio value and its level reference tone will be around -12 to -16 ppm (peak program meter). Tracking usually requires more headroom, so -14 to -16 ppm or 14 to 16 decibels below digital full scale works well. Example: your analog ‘0′ VU reference tone would appear at -14 ppm, leaving a margin of 14db peak headroom above 0 VU. Mastering engineers utilize tighter dynamics control, so a margin of -10 to -12 ppm is usually enough. Now after all that, I’m going to tell you that tones of any kind are not necessary for DAT recording.

The use of 10 kHz and 100 Hz tones are also not necessary for DAT recording. These tones are used for azimuth alignment, and high and low frequency playback equalization on analog tape recorders. Such alignment is not user definable on DAT recorders, so using these tones might send the wrong message regarding your experience with digital recording.

Bud Bremner owns and operates Coastal Mastering in Vancouver, BC.

Vocals in the Studio by Simon Pressey

September 18th, 2002

Getting the best possible performance from your vocalist is paramount in popular music recording; here are a few tips that can help you capture them. Find out which time of day the artist feels most comfortable singing at and arrange the vocal recording part of the session around that. Try to schedule recording the vocals throughout the recording session, not on the last day(s) of it — even experienced vocalists can usually only be at their best for three hours a day. Arrange for somewhere private the vocalist can warm up or practice, with rough mixes of the tracks preferably.

Some vocalists like to perform with the band and friends around, others prefer a more intimate environment. Discuss this well beforehand so you can avoid offending or embarrassing the peanut gallery or your vocalist. Print up multiple copies of the lyrics, including all repeated lines, verses and choruses. Use a clear font that is legible in low light, and number the lines and sections. This makes for easier communication between all parties. Prepare the recording area ahead of time. Make sure the temperature is comfortable and the area free of air conditioning drafts. Try to create a mood, and a room that is buzz-free with adjustable lighting. Have some candles available, a comfortable stool, note paper, pens and pencils, a pitcher of warm water (not iced), a couple of glasses, Kleenex and a garbage bin. Almost all singers like to have something particular, be it a mascot or a bottle of scotch. Be prepared — finding Sambucca at 3 a.m. on a Sunday can be tough. I usually tape the lyrics to the boom of a fully-extended mic stand and back light them with a Littlelite; this has the advantage of readability without the vocalist moving their head and is less acoustically troublesome.

If you’re the engineer, set up and listen to the headphone mix ahead of time, with the same model headphones at the same volume. Monitor mixes can dramatically affect peoples’ pitch and timing. Try the singers’ headphones yourself, sing along to the track and get the assistant to adjust the mix so it sounds comfortable to you. Be prepared to use loudspeaker monitoring — a good vocal performance is worth the small sacrifice in fidelity. Attention to a combination of these details has rewarded me far in excess of the effort required to take care of them.

Simon Pressey, Engineer/Producer, Chief Engineer at Le Studio Morin Heights. Credits include Lawrence Gowan, Patricia Conroy, the Tea Party, the Headstones and Celine Dion.

Tips for Improving Your DAT mix by Greg Below

September 18th, 2002

It has been brought to my attention that many people in the recording industry under-estimate the vast improvement a good set of A/D (analog to digital) and D/A (digital to analog) converters can make! I realize the majority of engineers out there insist on mixing to DAT and accept DAT machines for what they are, a medium to which one can convert and store high quality analog sound information into a digital format at little expense.

Try mixing as hot as possible to DAT with a good set of external 24-bit A/D converters instead of the cheap 16-bit converters supplied in Tascam, Fostex or Sony DAT machines. You may be surprised, if you are not already, at the sonic quality that will make. Also, keep in mind that once you enter the digital domain, keep it that way; converting back and forth from digital to analog will greatly diminish sonic quality as well as create dithering problems. Most professional mastering facilities agree and have the capabilities to keep your material in the digital domain until the format is decided upon.

Greg Below – independent producer/engineer, Distort/Sonic Pineapple Recording Studio. Greg has recorded for EMI Publishing, BMG and FRE Records, as well as many independents.

Creating the Mood in the Studio by Doug McCann

September 18th, 2002

The studio control room environment can, is, and always will be one of the weirdest places to visit. It is amazing how many people go deaf, forget everything about good manners or just become brain dead the minute they walk through the door.

We all know that there are no rules when it comes to getting the magic to tape, drive, RAM or conductive jello. But there are some basic methods we all employ to capture a sound.

The hard part isn’t twisting the knobs. The really hard part is creating an environment conducive to inspired performance within the studio, and the trying to control all of the interference from the outside world. That outside interference can include overly amorous girl/boyfriends, band mates, managers, label execs, video producers, assistant engineers, photographers, other studio clients, other studio owners, delivery guys, meter readers, product reps, dogs, cats, telephones and airplanes. I have lost a lifetime’s worth of wonderful takes all because of ill-timed interruptions.

If you are not a part of the process, then just go away. I know that sounds rude, but it is frequently the best way for you to contribute in a positive way to the session. If you are asked or invited to stay, sit still, be quiet and LISTEN. By concentrating as hard on what you are hearing as those involved in creating the recording, you will avoid becoming one of those horror stories every producer, engineer, musician, etc., hates to tell.

Doug McCann – Producer/Engineer, Soundscape Audio Design; Co-owner of Beta Sound Recorders. Credits include Randy Travis, Patricia Conroy, Terri Harris and the R&B All-Stars.


4056 Dorchester Rd., #202,Niagara Falls, ON
Canada L2E 6M9 Phone: 905-374-8878
FAX: 888-665-1307 mail@nor.com
Web Site Produced by NWC